- monthly subscription or
- cancelable any time
"Tell the chef, the beer is on me."
“ 100 Best Graphic Novels- great compilation www.google.com/... ”— ruhi
The other day, I painted a bleak picture of the reality of true environmental responsibility being more expensive and less convenient, in general, than our current lifestyle. But it’s not always that way, and there are a lot of benefits.
You may not be able to own a house, or you may need to compromise on some of your “requirements” and get a smaller one. And while your parents or grandparents may have been able to afford vacation homes, you probably won’t. But look at the massive amounts of time and money that go into maintaining a home (or two). How many rooms do you have now? How much time does it take you each week to keep the place clean? How much do you enjoy doing that? And how clean does it end up being?
In reality, if you’re in or a near a big city, you’ll probably be renting for a while. But that’s not so bad, either. Isn’t it nice not to shovel snow in the winter or mow the lawn in the summer? When was the last time you had to worry about how expensive it’ll be to repair the roof? And have you ever had to move when owning your property? It’s a lot more complicated and potentially a lot more expensive (especially now). As a renter, you don’t need to care that the real estate market is crashing or your neighborhood’s land values are decreasing or the furnace needs an expensive repair. If the building falls apart, you can just not renew your lease and go somewhere better. The owner’s stuck with it.
You’ll probably need to make do with less stuff. But stuff sucks. The more stuff you have, the more space it takes up, the more you have to dust, the more you can lose, and the more you have to pack if you want to move. Your stuff weighs you down. Life is generally easier with less stuff.
Meat production is incredibly energy-inefficient, so it’s environmentally responsible to eat less (or no) meat. Read this. Generally, we should be eating more plants: a lot of leaves, stems, and roots, and moderate quantities of fruits, nuts, and seeds. These should replace large quantities of the meats, oils, sugars, and processed starches that constitute most of the modern western diet. In addition to being more environmentally and ethically responsible, this also makes people much healthier and happier, which drives health-care costs down and dramatically improves (and prolongs) lives.
By using your feet or mass-transit for much or all of your transportation, you save (literally) tons of wasted resources in automobile production, operation, maintenance, and disposal. Walking and biking are also great exercise, making you healthier and happier. And you save a lot of time, money, and frustration by not using your car and sitting in traffic every day. Even if it makes sense to keep a car for occasional use (travel, shopping, etc.), you’ll save dramatically on fuel and maintenance costs by not using it in your everyday commute (or using it for a much shorter distance), and it’s likely to last much longer.
There are tons of other benefits to an environmentally responsible lifestyle. What am I forgetting?
Marco, what you are forgetting is that the American economy thrives on debt. The Government wants you to buy cars and take out a loan on which you will pay interest for at least five years. And by the time you get done paying off that car, it is time for another one. There is nothing wrong in using public transportation. But the thing is, almost all towns and cities in the US have extremely unreliable public transport, if at all. People are forced to buy cars/bikes etc because the frequency of the bus is around once per hour. Or the route of the bus makes it almost impossible to be of any use. Why doesn’t the Government put in more money in expanding the public transportation and make it more convenient for people to use them? People in New York and other big cities use public transport because it is reliable and easily accessible. The size of the city is so humungous. Gas prices are comparatively higher. Parking costs more! I remember reading an earlier post where you had said that “people in New York are already using public transport. Why can’t people from other parts of the country do the same?” (paraphrasing you). People in New York are doing it because for majority of them, using public transport is a necessity and not because they like it. People in other parts of the country use cars because that is the only way they can get around town! Try telling the Government to invest more in public transport.
“ I didn’t say everything that I could have: That she was frustrated because she was still a virgin at twenty seven! That she was forbidding me what was forbidden to her! That to marry someone you don’t know, for his money, is prostitution. That despite her locks of hair and her lipstick, she was acting like the state..that…etc. ”—
"Tell the chef, the beer is on me."
"Basically the price of a night on the town!"
"I'd love to help kickstart continued development! And 0 EUR/month really does make fiscal sense too...